[unpleasant] Address Comments on Styles and Improve Citation Style

[HumphreyYang]

This PR resolves #445.

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for taupe-gaufre-c4e660 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	27e56483a5e7f77557f0afab2bf0f2f90fd2cbed
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/taupe-gaufre-c4e660/deploys/66860c736177dd00083bceac
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-495--taupe-gaufre-c4e660.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[github-actions[bot]]

🚀 Deployed on https://66860e4269854550340179d2--taupe-gaufre-c4e660.netlify.app

[HumphreyYang]

Many thanks @mmcky.

The old version is

and the cite:t version is

I think cite:t is closer to the citation style we want to use here, but please let me know if I should revert this change.

[mmcky]

thanks @HumphreyYang this is super interesting.

@jstac if we want to migrate to cite:t we will need to do a bulk edit across all lectures. Currently we have author_year style set for bibtex and the differences are shown above.

The engineer in me has always liked the reference in brackets [ but cite:t is closer to the usual text representation in economics.

[jstac]

@mmcky @HumphreyYang Regarding cites, that's a tough one. There are cites in other lectures that don't suit this style (should we make a blanket change). See, e.g., https://jax.quantecon.org/aiyagari_jax.html

I'd like to stay out of this if I can :grimacing:

[mmcky]

@HumphreyYang I think my preference would be to use the global author_year style that uses brackets as it is globally enabled. That will improve consistency.

• [x] convert cite:t to cite
• [x] open an issue to document cite:t and we can have a further think about switching styles (in bulk), but for now let's stay uniform in our approach. (#501)

[HumphreyYang]

Hi @mmcky, I have addressed your and @jstac's comments. Please let me know if there is anything else I can further improve.

[jstac]

Many thanks @HumphreyYang .