Closed pooyaravari closed 5 years ago
Thank you. Yes, here is the file: https://github.com/QuantEcon/lecture-source-jl/blob/pooya/rst_files/julia_by_example.rst
look at the line 462 and 478.
@PooyaFa Thanks. Were you using Jupyter lab or jupyter notebook for this? Also, the line numbers do not line up with the current source, and I am not sure which commit you meant. Can you check with a compiled version from master now?
@jlperla I used Jupyter lab. Now line: 485 and 501 in the most updated master.
Thanks! Are you still seeing the issue with the latest master? I get the following
Which has terrible formatting in jupyter lab (a known bug, see https://github.com/QuantEcon/sphinxcontrib-jupyter/issues/117 ) but it does seem to have the equation numbers?
I have the same issue in formatting as https://github.com/QuantEcon/sphinxcontrib-jupyter/issues/117 now (which I didn't have before). And still I don't see equation numbers (for both equation 1 and 2 as you can see here):
Great, thanks! Try it in jupyter notebook
instead of jupyter lab
. Regardless of the result, that might be as far as you can go now with the bug report.
Just to update on this, it looks like equation numbers are in if and only if we explicitly tag the equation with a
.. math::
:label: foo
{equation}
If that is expected behavior, I think this can be closed.
Hi All. Thanks for the report. The jupyterlab
issue is really disappointing.
@arnavs is correct -- the numbering will automatically appear for labelled math only. If there is no label then it is not numbered.
@PooyaFa is this still an issue. The default is not to label equations unless a :label:
is specified. Do you mind if I close this issue?
@mmcky I think this can be closed.
(So long as the right approach is documented (and works), then that should be good enough. Anything else would require too much rejiggering.)
Hi. Sure. Thank you.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:18 AM Arnav Sood notifications@github.com wrote:
@mmcky https://github.com/mmcky I think this can be closed.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/QuantEcon/sphinxcontrib-jupyter/issues/136?email_source=notifications&email_token=AKSTQPUVQH3IXT2QQ66JPXTP65MN7A5CNFSM4GBST42KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODZXHC2Y#issuecomment-510554475, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKSTQPQNIWMZ3FDI7FSFKYDP65MN7ANCNFSM4GBST42A .
-- Pooya R. Ravari PhD student in Economics at UBC https://sites.google.com/view/pooyarravari
thanks for the report @PooyaFa.
thanks @PooyaFa -- if you can drop the file here that would be great. thanks.