It might be possible to support two primary modes of operation:
READABLE: This would compile notebooks that are as simple as possible, making use of markdown and rendering markdown based tables, figure inclusions etc. This is more limited as markdown does not support all features of RST
COMPILED: This would place an emphasis on compiled output which would allow for less readable jupyter notebooks in favour of supporting more features of RST+HTML which could provide for feature filled notebooks. Given this tool is built as a tool to compile between RST and IPYNB this would be most fit for the default.
It might be possible to support two primary modes of operation:
READABLE: This would compile notebooks that are as simple as possible, making use of markdown and rendering markdown based tables, figure inclusions etc. This is more limited as markdown does not support all features of
RST
COMPILED: This would place an emphasis on compiled output which would allow for less readable jupyter notebooks in favour of supporting more features of
RST+HTML
which could provide for feature filled notebooks. Given this tool is built as a tool to compile betweenRST
andIPYNB
this would be most fit for the default.