A fix for a place in the analyses code where experiments would comment out one of two lines to properly run their experiment analysis. The discrepancy between experiments in question is a key for the measurementResults dict. Rather than continue using a hardcoded string as the dict key, I have added an attribute to the experiment class with the value that was used in the master branch, and overwritten the string in the rubidium experiment subclass. I have tested this change in Rb and it did not seem to break anything.
A fix for a place in the analyses code where experiments would comment out one of two lines to properly run their experiment analysis. The discrepancy between experiments in question is a key for the measurementResults dict. Rather than continue using a hardcoded string as the dict key, I have added an attribute to the experiment class with the value that was used in the master branch, and overwritten the string in the rubidium experiment subclass. I have tested this change in Rb and it did not seem to break anything.