Closed apkille closed 2 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 91.66667%
with 1 line
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 63.37%. Comparing base (
6847efb
) to head (6a1f908
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/QSymbolicsBase/literal_objects.jl | 91.66% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
after the JET tests pass feel free to merge. A couple of guidelines:
0.3.1
and use today's date in the CHANGELOG header for 0.3.10.3.1-dev
and use the string dev
instead of a date in the CHANGELOG header for 0.3.1@JuliaRegistrator register
Comments on pull requests will not trigger Registrator, as it is disabled. Please try commenting on a commit or issue.
welp... I JuliaRegistrator was a bit too trigger happy :D I hoped it will not respond if I put its handle in backticks.
as mentioned on the other pull request: actually, it seems the JET tests fail on master too, because of something I must have merged last minute as I was cleaning up the tests. You can just bump the threshold to 7 and not bother with them
Enables users to quickly define symbolic bras, kets, and operators with macros. If a basis for the quantum object is not specified, then by default the spin-1/2 basis will be selected.