search

QuantumSavory / QuantumSymbolics.jl

Computer algebra tools for symbolic manipulations in quantum mechanics and quantum information
MIT License
29 stars 9 forks source link

Aqua static analysis [$200] #65

Open Krastanov opened 2 months ago

Krastanov commented 2 months ago
Bug bounty logistic details (click to expand) To claim exclusive time to work on this bounty either post a comment here or message [skrastanov@umass.edu](mailto:skrastanov@umass.edu) with: - your name - github username - **(optional)** a brief list of previous pertinent projects you have engaged in Currently the project is claimed by `no one` until `...`. If you want to, you can work on this project without making a claim, however claims are encouraged to give you and other contributors peace of mind. Whoever has made a claim takes precedence when solutions are considered. You can always propose your own funded project, if you would like to contribute something of value that is not yet covered by an official bounty.

Project: Aqua static analysis [$200]

We run Aqua.jl static analysis during CI for this library, but currently, we have disabled the piracy and ambiguity checks, as they raise too many errors. This bounty is awarded for fixing these issues and enabling these checks. The bounty might require upstreaming some work from here into QuantumInterface.jl or other packages.

Required skills: Generic Julia skills.

Reviewer: Stefan Krastanov

Duration: 1 month

Payout procedure:

The Funding for these bounties comes from the National Science Foundation and from the NSF Center for Quantum Networks. The payouts are managed by the NumFOCUS foundation and processed in bulk once every two months. If you live in a country in which NumFOCUS can make payments, you can participate in this bounty program.

Click here for more details about the bug bounty program.

pooryousefshahrooz commented 3 weeks ago

Shahrooz Pouryousf Pooryousefshahrooz

Prateek Mantri mantri-prateek

Nithin Raveendran nithinitzme

Krastanov commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @pooryousefshahrooz ! Your post is lacking a bit of context. Are you saying you are interested in working on this or already doing so?

pooryousefshahrooz commented 3 weeks ago

Hi Stefan, sorry for the confusion. Prateek and I were working on it. But we did not have much progress. I will delete my comment and let you know if we have some work done.