Closed guitorri closed 9 years ago
@bastien-roucaries would you take a look at this?
Could we upack example on git tree ? I will allow to do regression testing on it.
Bastien
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Guilherme Brondani Torri < notifications@github.com> wrote:
@bastien-roucaries https://github.com/bastien-roucaries would take a look at this?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Qucs/qucs/issues/201#issuecomment-72218145.
...since it seems we will soon start some work on the transient solver, it will make sense to add several known currently-failing circuits to the test suite. Maybe leave them disabled by default and add a switch to include also (or only) them for testing during the development. I have already collected a few from the various issues and discussions, will later post a message to qucs-devel
to ask for some more examples which fail the transient simulations
There are some numerical differences with respect to 0.0.17 and 0.0.18. I am trying to bisect it.
Sorry for the noise. The issue is not with the 555 example...
These examples work fine with 0.0.18.
The two top schematics cause segfaults with current master.
Traceback: