QueueLab / mapgpt

Language to Maps
Apache License 2.0
1 stars 0 forks source link

Add test scripts for tool integrations and chat input #73

Open ngoiyaeric opened 1 month ago

ngoiyaeric commented 1 month ago

User description

Add test scripts to ensure all tool integrations are working correctly, the chat input works, and streams throughout the system.


For more details, open the Copilot Workspace session.


PR Type

Tests


Description


Changes walkthrough ๐Ÿ“

Relevant files
Tests
8 files
actions.test.tsx
Add unit tests for `submit` function                                         

app/actions.test.tsx
  • Added unit tests for the submit function.
  • Mocked dependencies like getMutableAIState and createStreamableUI.
  • Tested scenarios including user input and skip action.
  • +121/-0 
    Agent.test.tsx
    Add tests for InquiryAgent and LandUseAgent                           

    app/agents/Agent.test.tsx
  • Added tests for InquiryAgent and LandUseAgent.
  • Mocked dependencies like getModel and streamObject.
  • Tested execution methods for both agents.
  • +64/-0   
    cordinator.test.tsx
    Add tests for AgentCoordinator execution workflow               

    app/agents/cordinator.test.tsx
  • Added tests for AgentCoordinator.
  • Mocked dependencies like AgentFactory and upstash.
  • Tested the executeWorkflow method.
  • +54/-0   
    mapbox-map.test.tsx
    Add tests for Mapbox component rendering                                 

    components/map/mapbox-map.test.tsx
  • Added tests for Mapbox component.
  • Mocked mapbox-gl library.
  • Tested map initialization and error handling.
  • +44/-0   
    researcher.test.tsx
    Add tests for researcher function                                               

    lib/agents/researcher.test.tsx
  • Added tests for researcher function.
  • Mocked dependencies like createStreamableUI.
  • Tested successful research and error handling.
  • +50/-0   
    location.test.tsx
    Add tests for locationTool execution                                         

    lib/agents/tools/location.test.tsx
  • Added tests for locationTool.
  • Mocked dependencies like createStreamableValue.
  • Tested successful execution and error handling.
  • +71/-0   
    search.test.tsx
    Add tests for searchTool functionality                                     

    lib/agents/tools/search.test.tsx
  • Added tests for searchTool.
  • Mocked dependencies like createStreamableUI.
  • Tested successful search and error handling.
  • +81/-0   
    video-search.test.tsx
    Add tests for videoSearchTool functionality                           

    lib/agents/tools/video-search.test.tsx
  • Added tests for videoSearchTool.
  • Mocked dependencies like createStreamableUI.
  • Tested successful video search and error handling.
  • +77/-0   
    Configuration changes
    1 files
    package.json
    Update package.json for Jest integration                                 

    package.json
  • Added jest and ts-jest to devDependencies.
  • Added test script to run Jest.
  • +4/-1     

    ๐Ÿ’ก PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 1 month ago

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Reviewer Guide ๐Ÿ”

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    โฑ๏ธ Estimated effort to review: 4 ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ”ตโšช
    ๐Ÿงช PR contains tests
    ๐Ÿ”’ No security concerns identified
    โšก Recommended focus areas for review

    Test Coverage
    The test for processing events (lines 106-120) only checks if certain functions are called, but doesn't verify the correctness of their outputs or how they interact. Consider adding more detailed assertions. Incomplete Testing
    The LandUseAgent test (lines 48-64) only checks if the execute method returns an empty object. This might not be sufficient to ensure the agent's functionality. Consider adding more comprehensive tests for this agent. Mock Implementation
    The test for handling errors during research (lines 40-49) mocks the global fetch function. This approach might not accurately represent all possible error scenarios. Consider using a more robust mocking strategy or testing actual API calls in a controlled environment.
    codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 1 month ago

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Code Suggestions โœจ

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Enhancement
    Improve test coverage for LandUseAgent by adding more specific test cases ___ **In the LandUseAgent test, consider adding more specific test cases to verify the
    behavior of the execute method. The current test only checks if an empty object is
    returned, which may not be sufficient to ensure the agent is functioning correctly.** [app/agents/Agent.test.tsx [59-63]](https://github.com/QueueLab/mapgpt/pull/73/files#diff-9f9048ad51fd052842a529d5bd1212b1bda6e9b8a35d9669ee65533cacb34ea9R59-R63) ```diff -it('should execute and return an empty object', async () => { +it('should execute and return the expected result', async () => { + const mockResult = { landUseData: 'some data' }; + jest.spyOn(landUseAgent, 'execute').mockResolvedValue(mockResult); const result = await landUseAgent.execute(); - expect(result).toEqual({}); + expect(result).toEqual(mockResult); + expect(uiStream.append).toHaveBeenCalled(); }); ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion**
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion enhances test coverage by verifying the behavior of the execute method with specific expected results, improving the reliability of the test.
    8
    Enhance test assertions by verifying specific function call arguments ___ **Consider using more specific assertions in the test cases. Instead of just checking
    if certain functions were called, assert on the specific arguments passed to these
    functions. This will make the tests more robust and catch potential issues with the
    data being passed.** [app/actions.test.tsx [117-119]](https://github.com/QueueLab/mapgpt/pull/73/files#diff-fa2ec543ec1f4f40fd9924314de4a32cbdc6f88d8f805939c0b0d290ea1eb326R117-R119) ```diff -expect(taskManager).toHaveBeenCalled() -expect(researcher).toHaveBeenCalled() -expect(querySuggestor).toHaveBeenCalled() +expect(taskManager).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(Object)) +expect(researcher).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(Object)) +expect(querySuggestor).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(Object)) ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion**
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion improves the robustness of the tests by ensuring that the functions are called with the correct arguments, which can help catch potential issues with data being passed.
    7
    Verify API call parameters in the search tool test to ensure correct data transmission ___ **In the successful search test, consider adding assertions to verify that the fetch
    function was called with the correct parameters. This will ensure that the search
    tool is sending the correct data to the API.** [lib/agents/tools/search.test.tsx [50-54]](https://github.com/QueueLab/mapgpt/pull/73/files#diff-1bbbd960d3a03540d69992f30d4469d2de4505244cba389e3da5d9e9687cad00R50-R54) ```diff const tool = searchTool({ uiStream, fullResponse }); const result = await tool.execute({ query, max_results, search_depth }); expect(result).toEqual(searchResult); expect(uiStream.append).toHaveBeenCalledWith(); expect(streamResults.done).toHaveBeenCalledWith(JSON.stringify(searchResult)); +expect(global.fetch).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + expect.stringContaining(query), + expect.objectContaining({ + method: 'POST', + headers: expect.any(Object), + body: expect.stringContaining(`"max_results":${max_results},"search_depth":"${search_depth}"`) + }) +); ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion**
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: By adding assertions to check the parameters of the fetch function, this suggestion ensures that the search tool is correctly interacting with the API, enhancing test accuracy.
    7
    Enhance error handling test by using and asserting on a specific error message ___ **In the error handling test, consider using a more specific error message and
    asserting on it. This will ensure that the error handling is working as expected and
    that the correct error message is being displayed.** [lib/agents/researcher.test.tsx [41-49]](https://github.com/QueueLab/mapgpt/pull/73/files#diff-c2fe5e560dbaefc17eaae3a95d811070c44ecb6fca8a706d0a6245d77de3bffbR41-R49) ```diff +const errorMessage = 'Network error during research'; jest.spyOn(global, 'fetch').mockImplementation(() => - Promise.reject(new Error('Network error')) + Promise.reject(new Error(errorMessage)) ); const result = await researcher(uiStreamMock, streamTextMock, messagesMock); -expect(result.fullResponse).toContain('Error occurred while executing the tool'); +expect(result.fullResponse).toContain(errorMessage); expect(result.hasError).toBe(true); +expect(uiStreamMock.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining(errorMessage)); ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion**
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: This suggestion strengthens the error handling test by ensuring that specific error messages are correctly handled and displayed, which can help in diagnosing issues.
    6

    ๐Ÿ’ก Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat