Open Quuxplusone opened 8 years ago
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking with this bug.
Do you mean that we should reformat the swig interface files to confirm to LLVM coding style?
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'm not sure I understand what you're asking with this bug.
>
> Do you mean that we should reformat the swig interface files to confirm to
> LLVM coding style?
Clang-format should be improved first to handle SWIG files. Then SWIG files in
LLDB could be reformatted.
Ahh, right. I usually don't get CC'ed on bugs about clang-format, so I assumed this bug was about LLDB. But you've marked the clang-format component. I get it now.
I'll be great to have support for SWIG. LLDB has a lot of SWIG files in scripts/interface which currently formatted in old way, what is inconsistent with rest of code formatted in LLVM style.