Open Quuxplusone opened 5 years ago
Thanks for the detailed description!
I agree that this boils down to %4 = load...
in the snippet below blocking elimination, because it might alias %0
. If they do not alias, store 0, ...
is dead. But if they alias, the last store effectively makes both other stores dead.
But I am not sure how we could best integrate that kind of reasoning in DSE (and it seems no other compiler in the godbolt does that kind of reasoning).
define dso_local void @_Z8stdswapPiS(i32 %0, i32 %1) { %3 = load i32, i32 %0, align 4 store i32 0, i32 %0, align 4 %4 = load i32, i32 %1, align 4 store i32 %4, i32 %0, align 4 store i32 %3, i32* %1, align 4 ret void }
The following code optimizes well for
custom_swap
andrestrict_std_swap
, but has an additionalmov
instruction forstd_swap
:void custom_swap(int lhs, int rhs) { int temp = lhs; lhs = rhs; rhs = temp; }
void restrict_std_swap(int __restrict lhs, int __restrict rhs) { int temp = lhs; lhs = 0; lhs = rhs; *rhs = temp; }
void std_swap(int lhs, int rhs) { int temp = lhs; lhs = 0; lhs = rhs; *rhs = temp; }
Compiles into this IR with -O1, -O2, -Os, or -O3:
define dso_local void @_Z11customswapPiS(i32 nocapture, i32 nocapture) local_unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !7 { call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %0, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !17 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %1, metadata !15, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !17 %3 = load i32, i32 %0, align 4, !dbg !18, !tbaa !19 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %3, metadata !16, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !17 %4 = load i32, i32 %1, align 4, !dbg !23, !tbaa !19 store i32 %4, i32 %0, align 4, !dbg !24, !tbaa !19 store i32 %3, i32 %1, align 4, !dbg !25, !tbaa !19 ret void, !dbg !26 }
define dso_local void @_Z17restrict_stdswapPiS(i32 noalias nocapture, i32 noalias nocapture) local_unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !27 { call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %0, metadata !32, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !35 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %1, metadata !33, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !35 %3 = load i32, i32 %0, align 4, !dbg !36, !tbaa !19 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %3, metadata !34, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !35 %4 = load i32, i32 %1, align 4, !dbg !37, !tbaa !19 store i32 %4, i32 %0, align 4, !dbg !38, !tbaa !19 store i32 %3, i32 %1, align 4, !dbg !39, !tbaa !19 ret void, !dbg !40 }
define dso_local void @_Z8stdswapPiS(i32 nocapture, i32 nocapture) local_unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !41 { call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %0, metadata !43, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !46 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %1, metadata !44, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !46 %3 = load i32, i32 %0, align 4, !dbg !47, !tbaa !19 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %3, metadata !45, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !46 store i32 0, i32 %0, align 4, !dbg !48, !tbaa !19 %4 = load i32, i32 %1, align 4, !dbg !49, !tbaa !19 store i32 %4, i32 %0, align 4, !dbg !50, !tbaa !19 store i32 %3, i32* %1, align 4, !dbg !51, !tbaa !19 ret void, !dbg !52 }
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1
attributes #0 = { norecurse nounwind uwtable "correctly-rounded-divide-sqrt-fp-math"="false" "disable-tail-calls"="false" "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "min-legal-vector-width"="0" "no-frame-pointer-elim"="false" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-jump-tables"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "no-signed-zeros-fp-math"="false" "no-trapping-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="x86-64" "target-features"="+cx8,+fxsr,+mmx,+sse,+sse2,+x87" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" } attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone speculatable }
As we see from the example that annotates the parameters with __restrict, the problem appears to be that the risk of lhs aliasing rhs disables the optimizer's ability to remove the dead store in the second line of std_swap. It is able to see that if they don't alias, the store in line 2 is dead. It is not able to see that if they do alias, the store in line 3 is dead and the store in line 2 is dead.
See it live: https://godbolt.org/z/8nCTnL
The real life problem here is that types that manage a resource but do not implement a custom std::swap, as well as all types that recursively contain a type that manages a resource, suffer from reduced performance for using std::swap. The larger, slightly more meaningful test case showing how I arrived at this reduction and its relationship to std::swap:
struct unique_ptr { unique_ptr(): ptr(nullptr) { } unique_ptr(unique_ptr && other) noexcept: ptr(other.ptr) { other.ptr = nullptr; } unique_ptr & operator=(unique_ptr && other) noexcept { delete ptr; ptr = nullptr; ptr = other.ptr; other.ptr = nullptr; return *this; } ~unique_ptr() noexcept { delete ptr; }
};
void custom_swap(unique_ptr & lhs, unique_ptr & rhs) noexcept { int * temp = lhs.ptr; lhs.ptr = rhs.ptr; rhs.ptr = temp; }
void inlined_std_swap(unique_ptr & lhs, unique_ptr & rhs) noexcept { int * temp_ptr = lhs.ptr; lhs.ptr = nullptr;
}
void std_swap(unique_ptr & lhs, unique_ptr & rhs) noexcept { auto temp = static_cast<unique_ptr &&>(lhs); lhs = static_cast<unique_ptr &&>(rhs); rhs = static_cast<unique_ptr &&>(temp); }
See it live: https://godbolt.org/z/tWjmzo