Closed mcol closed 1 week ago
@mcol: Yes, I guess this is an ugly left-over before RLum-class
object time. I suggest setting it to defunct directly and then we remove it in a version 1.x.x
.
I take that you mean to remove the code altogether and for the time being throw a warning if somebody were to set the argument, but just say if you meant something else.
There's this TODO note: https://github.com/R-Lum/Luminescence/blob/759a1142651cc557f9fd06c6b061d1aff244cdf9/R/fit_CWCurve.R#L224-L225
As now with more coverage we hit the lines where
output.path
is used and an output CSV file is generated, we get a note when runningR CMD check
:So perhaps it's a good reason to actually remove that argument?