Editing proofs

[jvcasillas]

The first round of proofs are in. You can download them here. I need everybody to do the following:

• [x] review all information on the title page, particularly author name(s) and affiliation(s).
• [x] Read the entire proof, make note of necessary amendments (mainly typos)
• [x] Put comments (with reference to page and line) in this issue (ASAP)

[jvcasillas]

Refs cited in bib but not in main text (they are cited in supplementary materials):

• Aust, F., & Barth, M. (2018). papaja: Create APA manuscripts with R Markdown. Retrieved from https:// github.com/crsh/papaja
• Beckman, M. E., Díaz-Campos, M., McGory, J. T., & Morgan, T. A. (2002). Intonation across Spanish in the Tones and Break Indices framework. Probus, 14, 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2002.008
• Butragueño, P. M. (2003). Hacia una descripción prosódica de los marcadores discursivos. Datos del español de México. La Tonía: Dimensiones Fonéticas y Fonológicas, 375–402.
• Butraguenño, P. M. (2004). Configuraciones circunflejas en la entonación del español mexicano. Revista de Filología Española, 84(2), 347–373.
• Colantoni, L. (2011). Broad-focus declaratives in Argentine Spanish contact and non-contact varieties. John Benjamins.
• Colantoni, L., & Gurlekian, J. (2004). Convergence and intonation: Historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1366728904001488
• Estebas-Vilaplana, E., & Prieto, P. (2010). Castilian Spanish intonation. In P. Prieto & P. Roseano (Eds.), Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language (pp. 17–48). Münich: Lincom Europa.
• Face, T. L. (2003). Intonation in Spanish declaratives: Differences between lab speech and spontaneous speech. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.46
• Face, T. L., & Prieto, P. (2007). Rising accents in Castilian Spanish: A revision of Sp_ToBI. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 6, 117–146. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.147
• Henriksen, N., & García-Amaya, L. J. (2012). Transcription of intonation of Jerezano Andalusian Spanish. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 21, 109–162.
• Labastía, L. O. (2006). Prosodic prominence in Argentinian Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1677– 1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.019
• Labastía, L. O. (2011). Procedural encoding and tone choice in Buenos Aires Spanish. Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, CRISPI, 25, 383–413.
• O’Rourke, E. (2005). Intonation and language contact: A case study of two varieties of Peruvian Spanish (PhD thesis). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
• Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation (PhD thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
• Quilis, A. (1981). Fonética acústica de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.
• Quilis, A. (1987). Entonación dialectal hispánica. In H. López Morales & M. Vaquero (Eds.), Actas del I Congreso internacional sobre el español de América (pp. 117–163). San Juan, Puerto rico: Academia puertorriqueña de la lengua española.
• Quilis, A. (1993). Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas. Madrid: Gredos.
• Sosa, J. M. (2003a). La notación tonal del español en el modelo Sp-ToBI. In P. Prieto (Ed.), Teoriás de la entonación (pp. 185–208). Ariel.
• Sosa, J. M. (2003b). Wh-questions in Spanish: Meanings and configuration variability. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 229–247. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.51
• Vilaplana Estebas, E., & Prieto, P. (2008). La notación prosódica del español: Una revisión del Sp_ToBI. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 17, 264–283.
• Xu, Y. (2010). In defense of lab speech. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn. 2010.04.003

[jvcasillas]

Spaghetti plots (Figs 3, 4, 7) and half-eye (Figs 2 and 8) don't show CI via pulls from posterior (not in the PDF nor online)

Comments added and vectorized versions uploaded.

[IvanAndreuRascon]

This is what I could find

• [x] Page 3. Line “Nonetheless, intonation is not traditionally” the reference has some weird dashes in de-la-Mota. I believe it should go with no dashes.
• [x] Page 8. Pyschopy3 consider PyschoPy3.
• [x] Page 9. Missing parenthesis in (95% CrI: [11.18, 14.72]) with a standard deviation of 13.60 (95% CrI: [12.38, 14.9].
• [x] Page 11. This sentence sounds awkward. Maybe delete “models” in “This approach to analyzing behavioral data models decision-making as a random-walk decision process” .
• [x] Page 15. is this grammatically correct?. "each participants’ data" in "As described previously, we fit a drift diffusion model to each participants’ data inorder to obtain estimates for boundary separation"

[GaboSJW]

• de-la-Mota is correct. (https://www.google.com/books/edition/Key_Issues_in_the_Teaching_of_Spanish_Pr/y1KWDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=de+la+Mota,+2019&pg=PT210&printsec=frontcover)

• Page 3. Line “Nonetheless, intonation is not traditionally” the reference has some weird dashes in de-la-Mota. I believe it should go with no dashes.

[jvcasillas]

This is what I could find

• [x] Page 3. Line “Nonetheless, intonation is not traditionally” the reference has some weird dashes in de-la-Mota. I believe it should go with no dashes.
• [x] Page 8. Pyschopy3 consider PyschoPy3.
• [x] Page 9. Missing parenthesis in (95% CrI: [11.18, 14.72]) with a standard deviation of 13.60 (95% CrI: [12.38, 14.9].
• [x] Page 11. This sentence sounds awkward. Maybe delete “models” in “This approach to analyzing behavioral data models decision-making as a random-walk decision process” .
• [x] Page 15. is this grammatically correct?. "each participants’ data" in "As described previously, we fit a drift diffusion model to each participants’ data inorder to obtain estimates for boundary separation"

I think "participants' data" is correct. I'm bad with this but I'll ask a few people.

[juanjgarridop]

Hi all!! Here are my comments:

• Add 's to singular nouns; add ' to plural nouns ending in -s. 'Each' precedes a singular noun, so it should be "to each participant's data..." as Iván suggested.
• Page 2, paragraph 3: In "This is, in part, because in everyday discourse speakers can use intonation for numerous communicative functions, such as indicating syntactic structure, signaling pragmatic meaning, e.g., whether an utterance is a question or a statement, focusing constituents, conveying affective meaning, etc." The 'e.g.' is confusing to me. I don't know if it refers to all the items after it or only the one next to it. Should it go in parentheses to avoid confusion?
• Page 18, towards the bottom of the page: In "That is to say, in specific contexts these same words can appear in statements as well, in some cases with a pitch accent (i.e., Qué beba María) and in others without (i.e., Que bebe María)." I do not understand the first example 'Qué beba María'. Should it be 'bebe' instead of 'beba'? as in Yo no sé qué bebe María vs Este es el jugo que bebe María?
• Page 21, paragraph 1: In "though this reasoning is in line with previous studies, i.e., Trimble (2013b)." Should we put the citation in parentheses? (i.e., Trimble, 2013b)

Questions:

• Some of the authors are not affiliated to Rutgers University anymore, do we want to put everyone's current affiliations, or should we just leave Rutgers there since it is a RAP group project? I am ok with either choice.
• Can you hyphenate my last name? (Garrido-Pozú) that way they don't use only my second last name when they cite it
• Can we add our ORCID number too? Mine is https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3523-9623

[jvcasillas]

Hi all!! Here are my comments:

• Add 's to singular nouns; add ' to plural nouns ending in -s. 'Each' precedes a singular noun, so it should be "to each participant's data..." as Iván suggested.
• Page 2, paragraph 3: In "This is, in part, because in everyday discourse speakers can use intonation for numerous communicative functions, such as indicating syntactic structure, signaling pragmatic meaning, e.g., whether an utterance is a question or a statement, focusing constituents, conveying affective meaning, etc." The 'e.g.' is confusing to me. I don't know if it refers to all the items after it or only the one next to it. Should it go in parentheses to avoid confusion?
• Page 18, towards the bottom of the page: In "That is to say, in specific contexts these same words can appear in statements as well, in some cases with a pitch accent (i.e., Qué beba María) and in others without (i.e., Que bebe María)." I do not understand the first example 'Qué beba María'. Should it be 'bebe' instead of 'beba'? as in Yo no sé qué bebe María vs Este es el jugo que bebe María?
• Page 21, paragraph 1: In "though this reasoning is in line with previous studies, i.e., Trimble (2013b)." Should we put the citation in parentheses? (i.e., Trimble, 2013b)

Questions:

• Some of the authors are not affiliated to Rutgers University anymore, do we want to put everyone's current affiliations, or should we just leave Rutgers there since it is a RAP group project? I am ok with either choice.
• Can you hyphenate my last name? (Garrido-Pozú) that way they don't use only my second last name when they cite it
• Can we add our ORCID number too? Mine is https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3523-9623

Gracias, Juanjo. ¡Ya había puesto Furman y tu ORCID!