Closed redrinkwater closed 3 years ago
This has been structured differently to how we had originally asked for it to be mapped, however I think that this is potentially a better way of managing this data.
As long as we are happy to keep this structure, it is fine. The forms will need to be adjusted to allow new data to be entered following this structure
Form has been updated. The schema has been updated on cloned
I think these are the right fields in Specify (according to Martins notes). No data here. Martins notes for the migration:
"In order to maintain the association between a name and its language this data has been imported slighly differently to the specification here. Three fields are potentially used per record. text1,text2 and text3. Text1 contains a string giving the name of the data being stored. Text2 contains the first value of an association. Text3 conatins the second value of an association.
Local names are stored with ""Local name"" in text1 The value in the local name field in text2 The value of the local name lang field in text3
Uses are stored wih ""Use"" in the text1 field The value of the uses field in text2
One record per associated MV record is stored