Closed karawoo closed 6 years ago
To recap comments that came up in the August 6th meeting (let me know if anyone feels I haven't captured these accurately):
Also, here are some resources on effective codes of conduct:
Thanks Kara, Best, Joe
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2018, at 5:19 PM, Kara Woo notifications@github.com wrote:
Also, here are some resources on effective codes of conduct:
HOWTO design a code of conduct for your community Code of conduct evaluations — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Hi Folks I just found some interesting resources on twitter: https://twitter.com/InclusionInML/status/1027253622395031553
The text is:
Updated D&I page @NipsConference (https://nips.cc/public/DiversityInclusion …):
@WiMLworkshop: http://wimlworkshop.org/
@black_in_ai: https://blackinai.github.io/
Latinx in AI: http://www.latinxinai.org/nips-2018
Queer in AI: https://queerai.github.io/QueerInAI/
Jews in ML: https://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~mlt142/JIML?format=standalone …
Also this one: https://dublin2019.com/members-area/code-of-conduct/
Particularly as it gives some concrete examples ( see the Anti-racism statement section)
one more: https://otter.technology/blog/2018/08/09/evolving-code-of-conduct-language/
Particularly use of phrases like reporter and reported person.
Some resources from Heather Turner:
I'll also share ones from other Linux Foundation projects:
For R-Ladies, I remember we used a few resources to help and guide us. Some resources we used:
It was important for us to add at the very top all the things that are not allowed and what harassment includes.
And some great responses to code of conduct FAQs: https://www.ashedryden.com/blog/codes-of-conduct-101-faq
I think this is overall a good example of a CoC and we could recommend it more or less as is to event organizers. It's basically the same as the Geek Feminism CoC, which has a lot of experience and expertise behind it.
There is one sentence in the Reporting section that I'd suggest changing:
If the person who is harassing you is on the team, they will recuse themselves from handling your incident.
If someone is already harassing me, I'm not going to trust them to recuse themself from handling the incident report. I think instead other members of the team should be responsible for ensuring that someone who is accused of harassment isn't allowed to field harassment reports about themself. And there should be ways of reporting that support this -- I should be able to make a report directly to someone I trust, not just to an email address that may go to multiple people including the person I'm reporting on.
As discussed on 2 July, I've uploaded the R-Ladies code of conduct to the repo. I'm opening this issue to discuss any adaptations we'd like to make. If you have thoughts, feel free to leave them here.