RConsortium / r-repositories-wg

RC Working Group on Repositories
37 stars 8 forks source link

Missing email conversation #22

Closed llrs closed 1 year ago

llrs commented 1 year ago

I see that in the meeting on 2022-12-05 there is a summary of an exchange with the CRAN team:

The email sent to CRAN with a doodle poll to try to set up a meeting before the end of the year provoked an unhelpful response from BDR.

I am not aware of said exchange, and I thought that no email was sent after last meeting. I was not in the email exchange, while I was in other emails to and from CRAN, and I haven't found it in the Documents folder. Perhaps it won't be added there for privacy concerns, could someone (@joseph-rickert ?) forward me these emails?

joseph-rickert commented 1 year ago

Hello Lluis,

email between individuals are generally considered to be confidential. Why do you want them?

Best regards, Joe

Joseph B. Rickert R Consortium Director Posit R Community Ambassador 408.489.0566

On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:50 AM Lluís Revilla @.***> wrote:

I see that in the meeting on 2022-12-05 there is a summary of an exchange with the CRAN team:

The email sent to CRAN with a doodle poll to try to set up a meeting before the end of the year provoked an unhelpful response from BDR.

I am not aware of said exchange, and I thought that no email was sent after last meeting. I was not in the email exchange, while I was in other emails to and from CRAN, and I haven't found it in the Documents folder. Perhaps it won't be added there for privacy concerns, could someone ( @joseph-rickert https://github.com/joseph-rickert ?) forward me these emails?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/RConsortium/r-repositories-wg/issues/22, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAN22VQBMDI5W3YY5D5GTXTWMGONPANCNFSM6AAAAAASX3NK3U . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

llrs commented 1 year ago

Indeed as it should be. I thought that email was sent in name of the working group, as mentioned in the previous minutes in November in which case I wanted to be in the loop. Sorry! Closing the issue