Closed bms63 closed 9 months ago
Here is Site updated with the vignette. Any wordsmithing or additional thoughts can be added in this branch and then we can update the website.
https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-pilot3-adam/main/articles/feedback_jan2024.html
Okay to merge in? Did you all have time to look at the website? It is updated with this feedback.
https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-pilot3-adam/main/articles/feedback_jan2024.html
Okay to merge in? Did you all have time to look at the website? It is updated with this feedback.
https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-pilot3-adam/main/articles/feedback_jan2024.html
Thanks, @bms63 and @robertdevine . Since this is where we want to keep track of Pilot 3 feedback, I'm fine with this, though I wonder if we should also include our initial feedback from late last year as well. For example : https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-wg/minutes/2023-10-06/ to now.
Another thought is since these notes may be a duplicate of notes taken from the R consortium R submission WG meeting minutes, albeit with our further interpretation of the feedback, I wonder if it would be more efficient to just source the source minutes and mirror this page : https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-wg/minutes/ on our site as well and just note that Pilot 3 feedback started on October 6, 2023.
Okay to merge in? Did you all have time to look at the website? It is updated with this feedback. https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-pilot3-adam/main/articles/feedback_jan2024.html
Thanks, @bms63 and @robertdevine . Since this is where we want to keep track of Pilot 3 feedback, I'm fine with this, though I wonder if we should also include our initial feedback from late last year as well. For example : https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-wg/minutes/2023-10-06/ to now.
Another thought is since these notes may be a duplicate of notes taken from the R consortium R submission WG meeting minutes, albeit with our further interpretation of the feedback, I wonder if it would be more efficient to just source the source minutes and mirror this page : https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-wg/minutes/ on our site as well and just note that Pilot 3 feedback started on October 6, 2023.
I do think we should add previous discussion around Pilot 3 from the WG to our website.
I was thinking we should split it out from the meeting minutes from the core WG group. This way we can add more context to what we need to work on, add links, etc.
but yes it is a bit redundant, but I think that is okay.
Okay to merge in? Did you all have time to look at the website? It is updated with this feedback. https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-pilot3-adam/main/articles/feedback_jan2024.html
Thanks, @bms63 and @robertdevine . Since this is where we want to keep track of Pilot 3 feedback, I'm fine with this, though I wonder if we should also include our initial feedback from late last year as well. For example : https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-wg/minutes/2023-10-06/ to now. Another thought is since these notes may be a duplicate of notes taken from the R consortium R submission WG meeting minutes, albeit with our further interpretation of the feedback, I wonder if it would be more efficient to just source the source minutes and mirror this page : https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-wg/minutes/ on our site as well and just note that Pilot 3 feedback started on October 6, 2023.
I do think we should add previous discussion around Pilot 3 from the WG to our website.
I was thinking we should split it out from the meeting minutes from the core WG group. This way we can add more context to what we need to work on, add links, etc.
Agree with splitting out the the Pilot 3 only minutes/notes/feedback from the core WG to only be included in our Pilot 3 site. Would you be okay to update to include the previous feedback, @bms63 ?
Okay to merge in? Did you all have time to look at the website? It is updated with this feedback. https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-pilot3-adam/main/articles/feedback_jan2024.html
Thanks, @bms63 and @robertdevine . Since this is where we want to keep track of Pilot 3 feedback, I'm fine with this, though I wonder if we should also include our initial feedback from late last year as well. For example : https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-wg/minutes/2023-10-06/ to now. Another thought is since these notes may be a duplicate of notes taken from the R consortium R submission WG meeting minutes, albeit with our further interpretation of the feedback, I wonder if it would be more efficient to just source the source minutes and mirror this page : https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-wg/minutes/ on our site as well and just note that Pilot 3 feedback started on October 6, 2023.
I do think we should add previous discussion around Pilot 3 from the WG to our website. I was thinking we should split it out from the meeting minutes from the core WG group. This way we can add more context to what we need to work on, add links, etc.
Agree with splitting out the the Pilot 3 only minutes/notes/feedback from the core WG to only be included in our Pilot 3 site. Would you be okay to update to include the previous feedback, @bms63 ?
Yes no problem.
@laxamanaj and @bms63, the URL to link the WG Meeting Minutes is: https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-wg/minutes.html [i.e. https://rconsortium.github.io/submissions-wg/minutes/ returns 404 Not found]. Thanks again.