Open cuboideum opened 1 year ago
AnthroGraph's PBP app uses the faulty classes instead of the correct ones.
I suggest to declare the faulty classes as equivalent classes of the correct ones and deprecate them.
@zarquon42b: What do you think? Will the faulty classes losing their current superclasses compromise the PBP App*s functionality in AnthroGraph?
I don't really understand the question.
I suggest to declare the faulty classes as equivalent classes of the correct ones and deprecate them.
The equivalence statement does absolutely nothing to the functionality of the application only to the consistency of the ontology
Unfortunately, option 1 is correct. We do have a problem.
The equivalence statement does absolutely nothing to the functionality of the application only to the consistency of the ontology
Correct. That is the objective of the maneuver.
Can we proceed as suggested, then?
The following ROIs describing parts of vertebrae are currently defined as subclasses of 'Entire vertebra' (rdfbones:EntireBoneOrgan_fma9914):
There are two problems with these elements:
There are of 'Segment of vertebra' (standards-si:SegmentOfVertebra) corresponding to the classes listed above:
The problematic class definitions need to be removed and the correct ones used instead.