Closed cuboideum closed 2 years ago
It would be more logical in data collection to have upper limb hand lower limb foot. One question arises is how much we want to offend the anatomists. Arm + forearm = upper limb; thigh + leg = lower limb. Cranium + mandible = skull, as I said before. I don't always follow these myself, but I do know that Chris Dudar, for example, does. (I think).
I think the structure of the tabs (what is scored where) should totally reflect the way you work in practice. The naming should please the anatomist (and Chris) as much as possible.
I agree, upper limb - hand - lower limb - foot makes more sense from the recording view point. This follows more the recording flow.
We are now implementing the following tabs:
@JEB13: Is this correct?
Fixed with commit RDFBones/Phaleron-Pathologies@46cdf8661327e01750720922e653340898c73bb0.
The palaeopathology main page is structured according to areas of the skeleton. These are represented by tabs in the following mock-up.
The Phaleron Bioarchaeological Project needs to decide which areas make sense for them and in what sequence they should appear. @JEB13, Eleanna, @HannahLiedl, @JessHotaling and @hayesleigh, please discuss and post results here.