search

RDFBones / RDFBonesPhaleron

An RDFBones implementation of the data collection routines developed for the Phaleron Bioarchaeological Project.
1 stars 0 forks source link

'Focal Bony Response': Clarification of categories #34

Closed cuboideum closed 2 years ago

cuboideum commented 3 years ago

The version of 23 September of the palaeopathology scoring key defines the data item 'Focal Bony Response' on page 5/6. This item depends on data item 'Type of Bony Response' as it only applies if 'Focal' was selected there.

The category denominated with the numerical code 0 is called 'Absent'. Does this mean that the bony response is not focal (implying that 'Diffuse' was selected for 'Type of Bony Response')? This would be redundant information. Or does 'absent' mean that none of the other categories (1 to 3) are applicable?

@JEB13, @eprevedo, @HannahLiedl, @JessHotaling and @hayesleigh, please comment.

HannahLiedl commented 3 years ago

Oh I see what you mean. I suppose the information is redundant in a way. If the "type of response" is "focal", you should specify what focal lesion it is. I usually put a 0 in for the diffuse bone loss then in order to not leave it blank. I suppose if we fill out the "focal bony response" the "type of response" becomes redundant. Or would it make it easier to find these kind of lesions?

cuboideum commented 3 years ago

I would suggest to leave the item 'Type of Bony Response' and only offer the item 'Focal Bony Response' if 'Focal' is selected.

In terms of RDF this would mean that there is always an instance of 'Type of Bony Response' while the presence of an instance of 'Focal Bony Response' depends on the label of the former. In other words, if 'Focal' is selected, the data item 'Diffuse Bony Response' is not offered for input and missing from the graph.

If this is the desired solution I suggest to drop the category '0 Absent'.

HannahLiedl commented 3 years ago

Yes, I think that is a good solution!

JEB13 commented 3 years ago

Yes, implement!

From: HannahLiedl @.> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 1:13 AM To: RDFBones/RDFBonesPhaleron @.> Cc: Jane Buikstra @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [RDFBones/RDFBonesPhaleron] 'Focal Bony Response': Clarification of categories (#34)

Yes, I think that is a good solution!

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/RDFBones/RDFBonesPhaleron/issues/34*issuecomment-929944179__;Iw!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!IR4oXc0jF0SSYlkK41fy1jUPPqIj-QkVIPwvH39-gqjQ-ZFjIK_pLRPW01KqvUU$, or unsubscribehttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVSBIRYQ3Q3EY4VOHMYBNY3UELDBFANCNFSM5E4WXU2A__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!IR4oXc0jF0SSYlkK41fy1jUPPqIj-QkVIPwvH39-gqjQ-ZFjIK_pLRPWo1B-kqE$. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOShttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!IR4oXc0jF0SSYlkK41fy1jUPPqIj-QkVIPwvH39-gqjQ-ZFjIK_pLRPWRf-YGDU$ or Androidhttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign*3Dnotification-email*26utm_medium*3Demail*26utm_source*3Dgithub__;JSUlJSU!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!IR4oXc0jF0SSYlkK41fy1jUPPqIj-QkVIPwvH39-gqjQ-ZFjIK_pLRPWAjwZPjA$.

JEB13 commented 2 years ago

Go ahead!

cuboideum commented 2 years ago

Fixed in commits leading up to RDFBones/Phaleron-Pathologies@66b3e95190215efb0f18d241d5d3aa66b0708bec.