Open cmungall opened 2 years ago
I guess this can be closed since there are rdflib
releases 6.2.x, 6.3.x, and 7.0.x by now, right?
Yes, go ahead and close
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 5:43 AM Philipp D. Rohde @.***> wrote:
I guess this can be closed since there are rdflib releases 6.2.x, 6.3.x, and 7.0.x by now, right?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/RDFLib/sparqlwrapper/issues/219#issuecomment-1731351357, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOJVXQ4EJCGLWJ5GFTLX3WBXPANCNFSM5U4LKT4Q . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
sparqlwrapper requires rdflib >= 6.1.1
I am using a library that uses rdflib6 but intentionally pins to exclude rdflib 6.1.1 https://github.com/hsolbrig/funowl/blob/main/Pipfile
The reason for the pinning is that the rdflib 6.1.x series polluted the rdflib namespaces which broke various tests
This was fixed in rdflib https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/pull/1686
However, there has not yet been a new release of rdflib
Does sparqlwrapper truly require >= 6.1.1 or could it be relaxed to 6.0.x and higher?