Closed hinchliff closed 6 years ago
There are some minor lingering visualization issues, with doubled links present: 161_interdomain_modify_manifest.rdf.txt
These are the two VLANs on either side of the A-RCI node. The first one (8f34d342
) is from the create, while the second one (88f80454
) is from the modify:
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/rciNet.rdf#rciNet/Domain/vlan/8f34d342-cddb-4271-89a0-c936d4082a98/vlan">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/topology.owl#CrossConnect"/>
<j.3:inDomain rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/rciNet.rdf#rciNet/Domain/vlan"/>
<j.3:message>Reservation 8440e336-a03d-4652-ae36-0284f37940ed (Slice 175) is in state [Active,None]
</j.3:message>
<j.3:hasReservationState rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/request.owl#Active"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/d5873c92-0fa6-412b-9ef4-bbaff90000fb#Link3-A-RCI/0/intf"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/rciNet.rdf#RciNet/IBM/G8052/TenGigabitEthernet/1/1/ethernet"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/rciNet.rdf#RciNet/IBM/G8052/TenGigabitEthernet/1/0/ethernet"/>
<j.2:bandwidth rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer">10000000</j.2:bandwidth>
<j.8:hasResourceType rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/domain.owl#VLAN"/>
<j.15:hasURL>http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/rciNet.rdf#rciNet/Domain/vlan/8f34d342-cddb-4271-89a0-c936d4082a98/vlan</j.15:hasURL>
<j.11:inRequestNetworkConnection rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/d5873c92-0fa6-412b-9ef4-bbaff90000fb#Link3"/>
<j.15:inConnection rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean">true</j.15:inConnection>
<rdfs:label>1012</rdfs:label>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/rciNet.rdf#rciNet/Domain/vlan/88f80454-6bb3-4f76-8040-a182063101e6/vlan">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/topology.owl#CrossConnect"/>
<j.3:inDomain rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/rciNet.rdf#rciNet/Domain/vlan"/>
<j.3:message>Reservation 76811909-da89-49ea-98b3-ebb146baa7ef (Slice 175) is in state [Active,None]
</j.3:message>
<j.3:hasReservationState rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/request.owl#Active"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/rciNet.rdf#RciNet/IBM/G8052/TenGigabitEthernet/1/1/ethernet"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/rciNet.rdf#RciNet/IBM/G8052/TenGigabitEthernet/1/0/ethernet"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bb4ef467-36fc-4a68-82e7-f156ee454d41#Link37-A-RCI"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bb4ef467-36fc-4a68-82e7-f156ee454d41#Link37-A-RCI/0/intf"/>
<j.2:bandwidth rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer">10000000</j.2:bandwidth>
<j.8:hasResourceType rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/domain.owl#VLAN"/>
<j.15:hasURL>http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/rciNet.rdf#rciNet/Domain/vlan/88f80454-6bb3-4f76-8040-a182063101e6/vlan</j.15:hasURL>
<j.11:inRequestNetworkConnection rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bb4ef467-36fc-4a68-82e7-f156ee454d41#Link37"/>
<j.15:inConnection rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean">true</j.15:inConnection>
<rdfs:label>1013</rdfs:label>
</rdf:Description>
Is that extra hasInterface
statement in the second one causing the doubled link?
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bb4ef467-36fc-4a68-82e7-f156ee454d41#Link37-A-RCI"/>
The model has extra interface and link objects that are causing visual double links. For example, nodes B-BBN and bbnNet has two interfaces (interface names are different by /0/intf suffix:
DEBUG - Interface http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bb4ef467-36fc-4a68-82e7-f156ee454d41#Link38-B-BBN between http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/d5873c92-0fa6-412b-9ef4-bbaff90000fb#B-BBN and http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bbnNet.rdf#bbnNet/Domain/vlan/b7ed96ce-8e5c-4197-80bb-b79108ce4f35/vlan has IP/netmask null/null DEBUG - Creating a link UnnamedLink13 from B-BBN to bbnNet
DEBUG - Interface http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bb4ef467-36fc-4a68-82e7-f156ee454d41#Link38-B-BBN/0/intf between http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/d5873c92-0fa6-412b-9ef4-bbaff90000fb#B-BBN and http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bbnNet.rdf#bbnNet/Domain/vlan/b7ed96ce-8e5c-4197-80bb-b79108ce4f35/vlan has IP/netmask null/null DEBUG - Creating a link UnnamedLink14 from B-BBN to bbnNet
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bbnNet.rdf#bbnNet/Domain/vlan/b7ed96ce-8e5c-4197-80bb-b79108ce4f35/vlan">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/topology.owl#CrossConnect"/>
<j.3:inDomain rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bbnNet.rdf#bbnNet/Domain/vlan"/>
<j.3:message>Reservation cef30e17-84b4-4497-8d5c-2b0660639a26 (Slice 175) is in state [Active,None]
</j.3:message>
<j.3:hasReservationState rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/request.owl#Active"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bbnNet.rdf#BbnNet/IBM/G8052/GigabitEthernet/1/0/ethernet"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bbnNet.rdf#BbnNet/IBM/G8052/TenGigabitEthernet/1/1/ethernet"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bb4ef467-36fc-4a68-82e7-f156ee454d41#Link38-B-BBN"/>
<j.15:hasInterface rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bb4ef467-36fc-4a68-82e7-f156ee454d41#Link38-B-BBN/0/intf"/>
<j.2:bandwidth rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer">10000000</j.2:bandwidth>
<j.8:hasResourceType rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/domain.owl#VLAN"/>
<j.15:hasURL>http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bbnNet.rdf#bbnNet/Domain/vlan/b7ed96ce-8e5c-4197-80bb-b79108ce4f35/vlan</j.15:hasURL>
<j.11:inRequestNetworkConnection rdf:resource="http://geni-orca.renci.org/owl/bb4ef467-36fc-4a68-82e7-f156ee454d41#Link38"/>
<j.15:inConnection rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean">true</j.15:inConnection>
<rdfs:label>2602</rdfs:label>
</rdf:Description>
It does have a statement that the two interface are owl:sameAs. I'll keep looking to see if I can filter out one of them
This is addressed in Flukes pull request RENCI-NRIG/flukes#17
From RENCI-NRIG/exogeni#175:
It was discovered that the
UnitDomain
field being used in themodifyStorage
storage function was not able to correctly differentiate between the B2 node that was being added and the B1 node that was already present but being modified.