Change name

[korenmiklos]

"Reproducible Research Standard" is taken.

• Data Availability and Code Reproducibility Policy Framework (DACoRPF)
• Framework for Data and Code Reproducibility Policies
• Journal Reproducibility Policy Framework (JRPF, JoRePoF)

(where Framework is explicitly meant to align with http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-005.

[korenmiklos]

• CDF: Code and Data Sharing Framework

[korenmiklos]

Top candidates

• Code and Data Sharing Standard
  • Data and Code Reporting Standard
  • Data and Code Availability Standard
• Code and Data Sharing Framework (CDF)
• Code and Data Sharing Guidelines (CDSG)
• Research Code and Data Sharing Guidelines (long, but to the point)
  • Guidelines for Sharing Research Code and Data

Excluded candidates

• Reproducible Research Standard (taken)
• Social Science Replication Package Standard (too long)
• Model Policy for Reproducible Research (the word Policy is a big turn off for authors)
• Data and Code Availability Policy Framework
• Replication Package Standard (too narrow)

[korenmiklos]

Data and Code Sharing Policy?

Two-step sales:

1. editors decide on adoption
2. authors actually use the checklist

[larsvilhuber]

There need to be two names. Editors want a policy. Authors get a checklist. The checklist comes via the policy.

For editors, this should be the

• [ ] Model Policy Framework for Reproducible Research

Note that the policy is about more than sharing - it's about computing (if chosen), verification (if chosen), where to deposit (if chosen).

For authors, conditional on a chosen journal policy choice within the Framework, they get a

• [ ] Checklist for preparing replication packages