Update tests part two | for the functional reliability of the module SD_UT

[HomeAutoUser]

• Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
• [x] Tests for the changes have been added / modified (needed for for bug fixes / features)
• [ ] commandref has been added / updated (needed for bug fixes / features)

• What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

• [ ] Bugfix (please link issue)

• [ ] Feature enhancement

• [ ] Documentation update

• [x] Unittest enhancement

• [x] other -- for safety when SD_UT module revised

• What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here, if this describes the current behavior) -- more test coverage

• What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

• Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

• Other information:

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (9d675ed) 69.46% compared to head (bf8010e) 69.62%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1218 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 69.46% 69.62% +0.15% ========================================== Files 134 134 Lines 10057 10056 -1 Branches 1623 1623 ========================================== + Hits 6986 7001 +15 + Misses 1723 1703 -20 - Partials 1348 1352 +4 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1218/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [fhem](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1218/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `59.88% <100.00%> (+0.20%)` | :arrow_up: | | [modules](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1218/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `69.62% <100.00%> (+0.15%)` | :arrow_up: | | [perl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1218/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `89.63% <ø> (-0.13%)` | :arrow_down: | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1218/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `69.62% <100.00%> (+0.15%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sidey79]

@HomeAutoUser Wenn Du noch nicht fertig bist, stell den Pull Request doch auf draft und erst auf ready for review wenn Du fertig bist :)

[HomeAutoUser]

@sidey79 hier sind wir fertig mit Ergänzungen.