fix meta.json syntax errors

[sidey79]

• Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
• [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / modified (needed for for bug fixes / features)
• [ ] commandref has been added / updated (needed for bug fixes / features)

• What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

• [ ] Bugfix (please link issue)

• [ ] Feature enhancement

• [ ] Documentation update

• [ ] Unittest enhancement

• [x] other

• What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here, if this describes the current behavior)

The needed Module isn't spelled corretly, and parsing meta.json causes error, because Digest:CRC does not exists

• What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Spelled correclty as Digest::CRC

• Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

no

• Other information:

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 89.25%. Comparing base (ce85586) to head (2bf0c12).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1242 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 89.21% 89.25% +0.04% ========================================== Files 43 43 Lines 2466 2466 Branches 170 170 ========================================== + Hits 2200 2201 +1 + Misses 112 111 -1 Partials 154 154 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1242/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [fhem](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1242/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `89.25% <ø> (+0.04%)` | :arrow_up: | | [modules](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1242/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `89.25% <ø> (+0.04%)` | :arrow_up: | | [perl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1242/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `89.25% <ø> (+0.04%)` | :arrow_up: | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1242/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `89.25% <ø> (+0.04%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sidey79]

@elektron-bbs Hab auch im SD_AS noch was gefunden und korrigiert