codecov[bot]
commented
2 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 71.59%. Comparing base (
664ac52) to head (c2cafc4).
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| FHEM/00_SIGNALduino.pm | 50.00% | 0 Missing and 2 partials :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1252 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 70.92% 71.59% +0.66% ========================================== Files 137 141 +4 Lines 10140 10184 +44 Branches 1584 1585 +1 ========================================== + Hits 7192 7291 +99 + Misses 1625 1569 -56 - Partials 1323 1324 +1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1252/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [fhem](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1252/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `62.33% <50.00%> (+0.82%)` | :arrow_up: | | [modules](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1252/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `71.59% <50.00%> (+0.66%)` | :arrow_up: | | [perl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1252/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `89.09% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1252/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM) | `71.59% <50.00%> (+0.66%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RFD-FHEM#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
[ ] Bugfix (please link issue)
[x] Feature enhancement (https://github.com/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/issues/1247)
[ ] Documentation update
[ ] Unittest enhancement
[ ] other
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here, if this describes the current behavior) -- no dispatch
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)? -- you can dispatch a WMBUS message to clientmodule
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
Other information: -- in order to receive messages yourself, the firmware must be adapted (later step) -- new PR after discussion https://github.com/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/pull/1248 -- codecov/patch isn'r required to pass for version Update.