codecov[bot]
commented
10 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
729c652) 16.7% compared to head (e433086) 16.7%.:exclamation: Current head e433086 differs from pull request most recent head aeec368. Consider uploading reports for the commit aeec368 to get more accurate results
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| src/contract/fungible.rs | 0.0% | 2 Missing :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #202 +/- ## ====================================== Coverage 16.7% 16.7% ====================================== Files 32 32 Lines 3874 3874 ====================================== Hits 646 646 Misses 3228 3228 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RGB-WG/rgb-core/pull/202/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RGB-WG) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [rust](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RGB-WG/rgb-core/pull/202/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RGB-WG) | `16.7% <0.0%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RGB-WG#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Description
This PR intent fix
Asset Taginitialization to wasm target compilation.When we try issuing a new contract with wasm target, the builder crashes on AssetTag initialization. I changed
std::time::SystemTimetochrono::Local.CC @cryptoquick