RGB-WG / rgb-core

RGB Core Library: consensus validation for private & scalable client-validated smart contracts on Bitcoin & Lightning
https://spec.rgb.tech
Apache License 2.0
207 stars 52 forks source link

Fix PartialEq for ConcealedValue to ignore rangeproofs #217

Closed dr-orlovsky closed 6 months ago

dr-orlovsky commented 7 months ago

Closes #214

codecov[bot] commented 7 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 15.4%. Comparing base (18e4932) to head (d75ca5a).

Files Patch % Lines
src/contract/operations.rs 0.0% 4 Missing :warning:
src/contract/assignments.rs 0.0% 2 Missing :warning:
src/contract/fungible.rs 0.0% 2 Missing :warning:
src/contract/commit.rs 0.0% 1 Missing :warning:
src/contract/state.rs 0.0% 1 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #217 +/- ## ====================================== Coverage 15.4% 15.4% ====================================== Files 33 33 Lines 4196 4193 -3 ====================================== Hits 646 646 + Misses 3550 3547 -3 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RGB-WG/rgb-core/pull/217/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RGB-WG) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [rust](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RGB-WG/rgb-core/pull/217/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RGB-WG) | `15.4% <0.0%> (+<0.1%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RGB-WG#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.