search

RGB-WG / rgb-core

RGB Core Library: consensus validation for private & scalable client-validated smart contracts on Bitcoin & Lightning
https://spec.rgb.tech
Apache License 2.0
207 stars 52 forks source link

Improve handling of anchor and bundle close method mismatch in validator #271

Open dr-orlovsky opened 2 weeks ago

codecov[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 13.2%. Comparing base (7ae9760) to head (b3be9b5).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/validation/validator.rs 0.0% 25 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #271 +/- ## ====================================== Coverage 13.2% 13.2% ====================================== Files 29 29 Lines 3883 3882 -1 ====================================== Hits 513 513 + Misses 3370 3369 -1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RGB-WG/rgb-core/pull/271/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RGB-WG) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [rust](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RGB-WG/rgb-core/pull/271/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RGB-WG) | `13.2% <0.0%> (+<0.1%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RGB-WG#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.