Closed alexheubeck closed 4 years ago
Hi @alexheubeck . This is just because logicle
is a subtype of biexponential
(as FlowJo's documentation discusses). This is how CytoML
represents it:
Note that it performs some adjustment of the width basis based on how it is defined for general biexponential versus logicle, which is why that looks different:
> -10^(2*1.15)
[1] -199.5262
So the short answer is that it already is bringing in the logicle transformation, just named as a biexponential. Of course if something looks incorrect in the data or statistics upon import, let me know and I'd be happy to look in to it.
Hey @jacobpwagner, Ah, I didn't know logicle and biexponential we're related in that way, that makes sense. The statistics look correct, so I think I'm all set. Thanks once again for your help!
Hi Mike and Jacob,
I had a question about loading in FlowJo workspaces with
flowjo_to_gatingset
. I am currently using logicle transform in FlowJo, and I'd like to bring the same transform into R. After I adjust my gates and save the transform and workspace, the transform menu looks like this:I use
flowjo_to_gatingset
to load the workspace in R:Once the workspace is loaded,
gh_get_transformations
returns this:I know FlowJo uses biexponential as it's default transform, but is there a way to bring in a different transform that was used in FlowJo?
If not, is there a efficient way to inverse transform the gating set, and retransform with logicle? Or, is there a way to only bring in the gates themselves, and apply them to an existing gating set with the correct transform? I apologize if there is an obvious answer, it looks like you have a few other open issues related to this but I just wanted to double check.
Best, Alex