Closed khandarius closed 6 years ago
The base of the logarithm is whatever you set it to be when you log transform your counts. The documentation states:
Note that for this to be a log-fold change, then the regression for u must have been fit on the log scale. This is returned in the matrix logFC. An approximation of the variance of logFC (applying the delta method to formula defined above) is provided in varLogFC.
So if you took log2
you can interpret a log fold change of 1
as a 2 fold change.
Can I close this issue?
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the answer, it's clear to me know. The issue can be closed.
Best regards, Darius
Hi,
Thanks for the great software. My question concerns the results of the differential expression tests performed with the hurdle model and a likelihood ratio test, like you present in your MAIT vignette (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/MAST/inst/doc/MAITAnalysis.html). I was wondering about the base of logarithm for the logFC coefficient. In the vignette, you set a fold change threshold using the R function log2(), which implies that the coefficients are in base 2. However, I don't see the base explicitly mentioned in the documentation. What about the output of the MAST function logFC()? I would like to be sure of the base for the results I am reporting.
Best regards, Darius