Closed ramhiser closed 11 years ago
After stepping through the munge
scripts that compensate and transform the data for the Bcell
panel, it turns out this script is ignoring the CD27
marker for Stanford when compensating. This is because the Excel file provides no filename for this marker (as well as some other markers related to other panels).
This is then likely related to a conversation Greg and I had earlier in the week. Specifically, Greg noted in an email:
Meena clarified that they used generic color controls for the panels, so you can use the color (PE-Cy7) tube for all other markers using that color in other panels, rather than markers specific compensation.
I will update the munge
script to use a generic color control if no filename is provided for a marker.
After the changes to the munge
scripts, the scale of the Stanford data is 0 to 4.5, which is similar to the other centers.
Currently, the CD27 observations in the Stanford data set are not being transformed properly. The range of values for the other centers is 0 to 4.5, whereas Stanford is -100 to 262,143.0.
Here is a kernel density estimate for the first Stanford sample conditional on
CD19+CD20+
. The source of the poor transformation is likely in themunge
code.I noticed the issue when the prior was elicited and lead to terrible gating. Notice the range of values in the distribution of peaks (they are all collapsed into a single vector across all samples):