RITlug / TigerOS

[MOVED TO GITLAB] Please visit new location: https://gitlab.com/RITlug/TigerOS
https://ritlug.com/tigeros
GNU General Public License v3.0
34 stars 11 forks source link

pycharm is not pulling itself in ( COPR issue) #36

Closed linux-modder closed 7 years ago

linux-modder commented 7 years ago

on the postinstall run (which still needs a explicit invocation on 0513), you see:

Error: This repository does not have any builds yet so you cannot enable it now. Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:17 ago on Sun May 14 00:32:46 2017. No package pycharm-community available. Error: Unable to find a match.

reason stems from the repo presently being a metadata only repo as evidenced with the repo file contents: proof highlighted by >>> <<<

[phracek-PyCharm] name=Copr repo for PyCharm owned by phracek baseurl=https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/phracek/PyCharm/fedora-$releasever-$basearch/

type=rpm-md <<< skip_if_unavailable=True gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/phracek/PyCharm/pubkey.gpg repo_gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 enabled_metadata=1

this is due to soem recent dist-git/copr outages/failures NOTHING to do with the script itself.

as a temporary workaround point the script at: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/phracek/PyCharm/fedora-25-x86_64/00549395-pycharm-community/pycharm-community-2017.1.2-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm

and optionally the -doc / -plugins rpms in the same directory.

axk4545 commented 7 years ago

Temp fix in place. Leaving open as a reminder to revert later.

axk4545 commented 7 years ago

@linux-modder do we know if this has been fixed upstream?

linux-modder commented 7 years ago

The repo data has not changed it seems still indicates rpm-metadata however might be a way to setup a monitor of his builds to point to the latest successful build (at present one from 2 weeks ago, however his cycle of builds does APPEAR to be every two weeks from the history)

axk4545 commented 7 years ago

Still an issue and possibly a blocker for full move to F26 @linux-modder @Tjzabel

linux-modder commented 7 years ago

@axk4545 @Tjzabel I will look again, sorry I've been sidelined with other projects recently sorry.

Tjzabel commented 7 years ago

@axk4545 why are we installing PyCharm this way, instead of installing it as we have for IntelliJ IDEA?

axk4545 commented 7 years ago

COPR is easier than the manual scripted install. We can discuss Friday though

Aidan Kahrs abkahrs@gmail.com

On Sep 6, 2017 7:05 PM, "Tim Zabel" notifications@github.com wrote:

@axk4545 https://github.com/axk4545 why are we installing PyCharm this way, instead of installing it as we have for IntelliJ IDEA?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/RITlug/TigerOS/issues/36#issuecomment-327606562, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUyLKxz_0mHhcfVpDRGbuinhEmTd_M3ks5sfwNSgaJpZM4NaPPk .

linux-modder commented 7 years ago

@Tjzabel PyCharm-community which is what is in play for TigerOS is not at the version needed/desired when pulled from IntelliJ IDEA

Tjzabel commented 7 years ago

@linux-modder Well, if the Copr still isn't available I can always make a script, even if temporary, to install the pycharm community edition if it's holding us back.

axk4545 commented 7 years ago

@Tjzabel @Tjzabel21 Just saw the comment. We can talk at the meeting. The short answer is it is better to pull from COPR since that is an RPM rather than add it to our collection of scripts and then have to maintain it.

axk4545 commented 7 years ago

@linux-modder I think this is fixed now with F26. Mind verifying?

axk4545 commented 7 years ago

Just tested against the COPR on Fedora 26 and it succeeded and can launch