Closed RJP43 closed 8 years ago
There are a series of things to fix based off of last semester's comments... lets come up with a plan to attack those issues as well. We can do some of this in person this week, but at least this issue gives us a starting point and place to jot down ideas.
Also we have some broken links on our site ... damn!
We're about 1/4 of the way through adding
tags to the barkley publications, it'll take a solid free night to finish that out, nothing too time consuming.
Are we doing verbs? Maybe? I think priority #1 would be focusing on finding differences between the originals and the Barkley texts. What was that website (I think?) that Dr. B showed us last year that compared and contrasted two uploaded texts? Do you remember that/ do you think we could use that at all? Otherwise, we could compare string lengths of paragraphs to narrow down what changed from the different publications, and figure out something more precise from there.
Visually, I'm not sure. Do you have any ideas?
What links were broken?
<app>
<rdg>
- Variant Mark-Up Reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r-8NGPJL1pZ20pnfvoX5OT0DkcDi-NBp5urJiZwx1sY/edit# _investigate automatic parts of speech markup _
<seg>
with noun or related words that are being possessed or possessingWe have started the variation markup which can be found in this article and we have ackled one issue from last semester regarding curly quotes. Still some work here, but I am closing this issue and will add these few things to the project check list in a later issue!
@spadafour
Let's touch base here...
Where are we in getting the Barkley Publication updated with
<p>
tags?What semantic markup have we decided to remove from the articles? And what did we decide to add? (ARE WE DOING VERBS? We want to remove the adjective markup except on archetypes and use of possesive pronouns, right?)
Once the Barkley Publications are complete I think we could do a bulk transcription of the articles by coping over the Barkley text and running through editing the differences? Do we want to do this? Can we think of a clever way to markup up what is added/subtracted? Is that useful markup for what we plan on creating visually?
What do we plan on creating visually?
Let's come up with a solid new research question... and I think we agreed it would be based on versioning?