Closed MonikaFu closed 5 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 0%
with 1 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 9.69%. Comparing base (
2d3f1ca
) to head (7c67ff4
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
R/prep_scores.R | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@MonikaFu It looks like the extdata
directory is big for this package. Is that expected?
Looks like the documentation needs to be regenerated to avoid the Warning
in R CMD check
I hope it's ok @MonikaFu I took the liberty to rebuild the docs since you are on PTO. Checks should pass now
I see that the codecob/patch
action is failing, though I remember we decided somewhere else that this was an action we might want to deactivate. @cjyetman can you remind me how/ where you disabled that portion of the codecov
action?
See #326
@MonikaFu I think we will need to update this file as well, do you have any idea how to do this? https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/pacta.executive.summary/blob/main/data-raw/remaining_carbon_budgets.R
Edit: Antoine is currently working on this. Tracked by https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/pacta.executive.summary/issues/318
I see that the
codecob/patch
action is failing, though I remember we decided somewhere else that this was an action we might want to deactivate. @cjyetman can you remind me how/ where you disabled that portion of thecodecov
action?See #326
e.g. https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/pacta.portfolio.import/pull/94
@AlexAxthelm extdata contains all the Rmd templates and example images so yeah, to be expected I'd say. It is not ideal that the templates are part of this package probably. Going forward (if we are planning to generate executive summaries regularly) we should probably move them to a separate directory.
Thanks @jdhoffa for taking care of the documentation! My bad. I will open a separate PR to remove the codecov
action for now. In general since the PR is approved by @jdhoffa and @AlexAxthelm are we good to go to merge it now?
Good to merge!
Update the thresholds and default scenario to align with what will be used in Swiss COP 2024.