search

RMI-PACTA / pacta.pkgdown.rmitemplate

https://rmi-pacta.github.io/pacta.pkgdown.rmitemplate/
Other
2 stars 0 forks source link

See if logo is also necessary in footer #4

Closed jdhoffa closed 7 months ago

jdhoffa commented 1 year ago

This also seems a bit crammed and has somewhat awkward spacing:

Screen Shot 2022-11-29 at 4 11 43 PM

Most other tidy-templates seem to have a much more simple footer:

Screen Shot 2022-11-29 at 4 13 03 PM
cjyetman commented 1 year ago

FYI... I was working towards trying to achieve something that mirrors RMI's own webpages, like https://rmi.org/our-work/climate-finance/

obviously, there's still a lot of work to be done to achieve that LOL

jdhoffa commented 1 year ago

Ah understood. Maybe this is something we should coordinate with RMI comms then? I would almost tend to prefer we keep them somewhat distinct from RMI logo/ design (to indicate that it is related but not necessarily approved content), does that make sense? Otherwise we will definitely need to have all of these sites go through a full approval cycle with comms and I'm not sure we're ready for that...

cjyetman commented 1 year ago

I'd love that, but I don't know if we can get them to pay that much attention to us. LOL

jdhoffa commented 1 year ago

So the responsibility is actually on us, not them I think... We are supposed to ensure that comms signs off on our public-facing stuff.

That's what I'm getting at lol, I can't be arsed to do that, so would rather remove the logo and not risk getting told off

cjyetman commented 1 year ago

ah, I thought you meant Comms might help determine what is the best design given their corporate branding, which to me would be ideal

jdhoffa commented 1 year ago

Yeah that might be the case as well. Would coordinate that with @AlexAxthelm probably

jdhoffa commented 7 months ago

Superseded by #25