Closed cjyetman closed 4 months ago
I'm not sure, I don't recall making a lot of use of the codecov.yml
action in the past (although I see the utility).
I think the CODECOV
token would be a good candidate for something to set at the RMI-PACTA
org level, I can look into creating one
resolved by #53
Not sure how/when/why it stopped working, but it appears that the uploading of test coverage results to Codecov is not happening (even though the workflow passes without error), which then means the badge on the README is out of date.
message in the workflow log says https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/pacta.scenario.data.preparation/actions/runs/8892294430/job/24416055743#step:5:53
Documentation for {covr} suggests one can/should use a token through one of a few methods, either explicitly through the
token
argument, or https://covr.r-lib.org/reference/codecov.htmlThe existing codecov.yml here does not have a token specified.
@jdhoffa do you have any idea what's going on here?