Closed cjyetman closed 1 year ago
Yeah I back this.
Since pacta.data.preparation
and pacta.portfolio.analysis
are totally separate packages, I think it makes sense to have a workflow that depends on both of them.
Given the discussion here https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/pacta.data.preparation/issues/278 I think we're leaning towards keeping separate workflow.data.preparation
and workflow.prepare.pacta.indices
because the output of workflow.data.preparation
without the indices/benchmark result files has legitimate purpose/use, so it's plausible that we would want to run workflow.data.preparation
but not run workflow.prepare.pacta.indices
. Therefore, I'm closing this issue because it's contrary to the current strategy.
For PACTA inputs to be fully ready to use, the indices portfolios need to be run through PACTA using the new data prepared by data.prep. That has been done in the past with RMI-PACTA/workflow.prepare.pacta.indices. It would be advantageous to integrate that process here, so it can all be done in one workflow, in the proper order.
@jdhoffa @AlexAxthelm