RPP Test Suite Upgrade 5 - Support for default QA perf testing and Tensor/BatchPD compares

[r-abishek]

This PR adds initial support in HOST backend for 3 functions to compare Tensor performance against BatchPD through a simple python script run. It currently uses a batchSize = 8 containing one image of each size as below. This could be changed if needed.

• 150x150
• 224x224
• 256x256
• 300x300
• 1024x768
• 1280x720
• 1920x1080
• 3840x2160

This can be expanded to other functions if this comparison style works.

[r-abishek]

@sampath1117 Could we add a sample output here in the comments for reference?

[r-abishek]

Sample command line: python3 runTests.py --case_list 21 36 63 --test_type 1 --qa_mode 1 --batch_size 8 --num_runs 100

Sample BatchPD vs Tensor comparative output:

[r-abishek]

Sample command line: python3 runTests.py --case_list 21 36 63 --test_type 1 --qa_mode 1 --batch_size 8 --num_runs 100

Sample BatchPD vs Tensor comparative output:

@paveltc This PR is ready to test for the Performance tests with BatchPD->Tensor comparison for QA. The sample command line in the above comment can be run to check.

[paveltc]

@r-abishek I'm seeing one failure when I run this: | 6 | resize_u8_BatchPD_PLN1_interpolationTypeBilinear | resize_u8_Tensor_PLN1_interpolationTypeBilinear | -10 | FAILED |

Any idea why this might be?

[r-abishek]

@paveltc @kiritigowda There are machine-dependent (cpu/gpu temperature / load dependent) random instances where the newer kernel could take more time. So we aren't able to control that.

So we've added that text as an "IMPORTANT NOTE:" below the results as shown below. That should address those random scenarios. Please see that NOTE below, and outputs from my run:

[kiritigowda]

@paveltc you merged this PR to master and not develop. You rebased and merged this. You have to revert this PR and merge to develop as squash and merge.