If a Medium token (1x1 cell) is changed to Native size, the footprint stays as one cell. If a Gargantuan token (4x4 cells) is changed to Native size, its footprint stays as 4x4 cells despite the user seeing no reference to a Gargantuan size.
To Reproduce
Drag two tokens onto a map with square grid
Change one token to size Medium and the other to size Gargantuan
Change both tokens to size Native.
Drag each token. Notice the originally-medium token still occupies one cell, while the originally-Gargantuan token occupies 16 cells
Expected Behaviour
The token footprint should be based on its actual size. If the token visibly covers 9 cells, that should be its footprint. Alternatively, natively-sized tokens could simply occupy one cell at its center.
Screenshots
This shows the two apparently-identical tokens with their differing footprints:
Native size footprints should probably be the size of the drawn image instead of one cell.
I can actually see benefits in this if it was something you could do deliberately. e.g. A token has an effect that covers a certain footprint. You could then use macros to apply the effect on other tokens within the footprint.
Describe the Bug
If a Medium token (1x1 cell) is changed to Native size, the footprint stays as one cell. If a Gargantuan token (4x4 cells) is changed to Native size, its footprint stays as 4x4 cells despite the user seeing no reference to a Gargantuan size.
To Reproduce
Expected Behaviour
The token footprint should be based on its actual size. If the token visibly covers 9 cells, that should be its footprint. Alternatively, natively-sized tokens could simply occupy one cell at its center.
Screenshots
This shows the two apparently-identical tokens with their differing footprints:
MapTool Info
1.14.3
Desktop
Linux Mint 21.3
Additional Context
No response