Closed koihoo closed 1 year ago
We have not prioritized the efficiency of the model, which is a point that could be further optimized. Can you tell us what the resolution of the image is? Also, as it takes a lot of time to load the model, processing only one image may slow down the average speed
It's important to consider the asynchronous nature of the CUDA API and the warm-up time required by your graphics card for optimal performance. For more detailed information on these topics, I recommend consulting both the MIMO-UNet paper and its accompanying code release. @koihoo
We have not prioritized the efficiency of the model, which is a point that could be further optimized. Can you tell us what the resolution of the image is? Also, as it takes a lot of time to load the model, processing only one image may slow down the average speed
The resolution of the image is 640*438,and I tried to experiment with a whole folder of pictures, including a total of 7 pictures, but the algorithm efficiency is still very low。
We have not prioritized the efficiency of the model, which is a point that could be further optimized. Can you tell us what the resolution of the image is? Also, as it takes a lot of time to load the model, processing only one image may slow down the average speed
The resolution of the image is 640*438,and I tried to experiment with a whole folder of pictures, including a total of 7 pictures, but the algorithm efficiency is still very low。
Thanks for your experiments. We do not particularly focus on the inference speed, since we regard dehazing as a computational photography task. How to make RIDCP more efficient can be valuable future work.
I did the efficiency test of image dehazing, and the model only got 1.5fps or even lower. Did you test it when doing the experiment?