A toolkit to define the skills, competencies and diverse progression pathways for RSEs to help track and manage their professional profiles and development.
One solution to malicious use what be to have aggregated profiles openly accessible rather than individual profiles. I.e. show the average skillset of RSEs in Manchester compared to London.
Discussion seems to be settling on starting with self-assessment, then discussing with supervisors/peers to see if some skills should be adjusted.
How do we discourage people from using the framework 'maliciously' and treating it as a competition, especially if profiles are open?