Closed kevinmarks closed 2 years ago
This is my concern too. Should have been clarified in the first place.
@kevinmarks If I remember correctly, the official considered this point. That's why RSS3 is used instead of RSS3.0, which is like Web3.0
The rss3.io blog itself reads rss3 'the feed in web3.0', making the OP's point, regardless of the mentioned 'consideration'
We would love to see an update of the RSS standard, but it has stopped updating for a long time and there is no way to continue the update of the RSS standard, but we also do not want to stop the search for free distribution of information, so we created a new protocol RSS3, RSS stands for a tribute to the history and 3 stands for Web3.
RSS has its version 2.0 3.0, and RSS3 will have its version 2.0 3.0, they are not related in any way.
We would love to see an update of the RSS standard, but it has stopped updating for a long time and there is no way to continue the update of the RSS standard, but we also do not want to stop the search for free distribution of information, so we created a new protocol RSS3, RSS stands for a tribute to the history and 3 stands for Web3.
RSS has its version 2.0 3.0, and RSS3 will have its version 2.0 3.0, they are not related in any way.
The lack of an update in RSS gave us Atom and it's extensible by design (being the basis of things like podcasts and ActivityStreams).
Aaron Swartz defined RSS3 20 years ago. Spec: http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/rss30 Announcement: http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/000574
Maybe you can be RSS4 instead?