Open simonwaid opened 1 year ago
I think your issue is that there is no VIA1 in the contact stack, so your port P2 isn't actually connected to the substrate, which causes the report of a floating node.
Agreed, the example is wrong. I have the issue in a larger circuit and tried to create a minimum example. Please find attached a new version of the example: test1.zip The extracted circuit contains the capacitor C0 between m5_1800_0#
and P4.m5_1800_0#
is a floating node.
@simonwaid : This may not be the optimal solution, and I don't know if it works in all cases, but it worked for this one; which is to use the option ext2spice resistor tee on
. That extracts the resistor as a T-model, splitting the resistor in half and giving the parasitic capacitance of the device to the midpoint node.
The underlying issue is that the resistor device itself is treated as a floating node, so any capacitance to it ends up as a floating capacitance.
The error is that there is not a default "resistor pi" model that redistributes the capacitance of the device itself (or coupling capacitance to the device) to the terminal nodes. I will look into a better solution for it, although the "resistor tee" option should be sufficient for you to use as a workaround.
When extracting parasitics adding a generic resistors results in a floating node. Please find attached a sample file. test.zip. The file contains two ports connected via a resistor on metal 5. One of the ports also connects to the substrate. One would expect no floating nodes when extracting the circuit.
Extraction was done using the following command:
select top cell; extract do local; extract all; ext2sim labels on; ext2sim; extresist tolerance 10; extresist; ext2spice lvs; ext2spice cthresh 0; ext2spice extresist on; ext2spice