Open FWuellhorst opened 1 month ago
@PatrickHenkel1 I want to keep the changes in the valve control models as the current main has some wrong annotations which are removed automatically by Dymola. Can you do the review?
Thank you for making a Pull Request to BESMod!
Our CI pipeline will help you finalize your contribution. Here's what is typically checked:
If HTML errors occur, I will fix the issues using a separate pull request. For the other checks, I will post the results here: https://rwth-ebc.github.io/BESMod/81_supCtrlInterfaces/index.html
Tips to fix possible naming violations:
If all CI stages pass and you have addressed possible naming violations, please consider the following:
BESMod.Media.Water
directly.C:
or D:
). Replace them with modelica://BESMod/...
.Once you have addressed these points, you can assign a reviewer. Although this process may seem tedious, ensuring CI passes allows the reviewer to focus their time on the actual modeling rather than syntax and unintended breakages caused by your changes.
If you have any questions or issues, please tag a library developer. Once again, thank you for your valuable contribution!
Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/BESMod/81_supCtrlInterfaces/charts
Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/BESMod/81_supCtrlInterfaces/charts
Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/BESMod/81_supCtrlInterfaces/charts
Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/BESMod/81_supCtrlInterfaces/charts
This PR closes #81. I explicitly did not add "Modelica internal" supervisory control as we do not have a use-case for this yet and a simple
extends
of the control subsystem enables the addition of a then naming independent Modelica internal supervisory control.