RadianSimulations / ghpc-feedback

9 stars 10 forks source link

T80B/T64B FCS No Auto Elevation Lead #285

Closed xuzhiren023 closed 4 months ago

xuzhiren023 commented 4 months ago

Describe the bug

T80B/T64B's FCS suppose to auto lead in both horizontal and vertical. However right now it's just horizontal, greatly reduce its effectiveness when shooting cross terrain on moving targets.

Are you playing with mods?

No

To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior: Using T64B/T80B Tracking a target when target is going through stable elevation change Round supposed to land on target but missed

Expected Behavior

FCS can auto lead target even if target position changed vertically.

Screenshots

n/a

Player Log

N/A

Sources There is a youtuber mentioned this problem is his playthrough video. He explain the correct behavior in video description. The youtuber is a current (or just retired) M1A2 SEP2 Tank Commander "A FCS just like my SEP V2, how ever there seems to be improper tracking between the gun and the optics. The Azimuth tracking is spot on, but the elevation tracking needs to be worked on. With the automatic lead its literally put the reticle on target, track it, lase, and pull the trigger and it should hit."

https://youtu.be/tUYVyAJiinU https://youtu.be/IM4AtoGeb3M

Desktop (Please complete the following information):

n/a

Additional context

n/a

JoshBusuito commented 4 months ago

Hello, please provide a source stating that the 1A33 fire control system should apply automatic lead in the vertical direction. The videos you linked do not demonstrate this, as this Abrams commander is not qualified to know the technical details of a Soviet tank.

xuzhiren023 commented 4 months ago

Hello, please provide a source stating that the 1A33 fire control system should apply automatic lead in the vertical direction. The videos you linked do not demonstrate this, as this Abrams commander is not qualified to know the technical details of a Soviet tank.

Hi Josh, Sorry, that's the only source I have now. If this is the correct behavior for 1A33 then I have no further comments on this. Please feel free to close this issue. Thanks.