Minor updates to README and scripts

[slosar]

Minor tweaks to readme and download scripts as per slack discussion.

Description

Three changes:

• README.MD now points to an existing yaml example file
• download_gleam.py spits out a deprecated message and points user to pyradiosky
• reference_simulations/second_generation/catalog_files/gleam.vot points to ../first_generation/catalog-files/gleam.vot (which, however still needs to be downloaded)

Types of changes

• [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist:

For all pull requests:

• [X] I have read the contribution guide.
• [X] My code follows the code style of this project.

[bhazelton]

@slosar We fixed the problem that is leading to all these test failures on the main branch. If you rebase this branch on main it should fix the tests.

[bhazelton]

@slosar Actually, I'm wrong. We haven't quite merged it into main. Let us do that and then I'll tell you when it's ready to rebase.

[bhazelton]

@slosar Ok we have the fix for the failing tests merged in now. I'm happy to do the rebase for you if you'd prefer.

[slosar]

Ok, I tried (there were some weird git hiccups, hopefully nothing is broken afresh)

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #378 (201402f) into main (1f88b96) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #378   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.17%   99.17%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        2054     2054           
=======================================
  Hits         2037     2037           
  Misses         17       17           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 1f88b96...201402f. Read the comment docs.

[bhazelton]

@slosar I think you did a pull after your rebase so I think this will not be able to be merged in properly. Is it ok if I clean up the git history? If I do, you'll need to delete your local copy of the branch and check it out fresh when I'm done.

[slosar]

Ok, all I wanted to do is to change one line in README and things have go south badly. :) Can you clean up after me? Thanks.

[bhazelton]

Sorry about that @slosar! I think it's all straightened out now, so you should delete your local copy of the branch and check it out fresh.

[slosar]

I hope this is now all fixed.