Add support for all UVBeam files

[bhazelton]

Description

Support all UVBeam readable files. This required adding support for parameters to pass the to UVBeam.read method.

Motivation and Context

fixes #335

Types of changes

• [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• [ ] Reference simulation update or replacement
• [ ] Documentation change (documentation changes only)
• [ ] Version change
• [ ] Build or continuous integration change

Checklist:

For all pull requests:

• [x] I have read the contribution guide.
• [x] My code follows the code style of this project.

New feature checklist:

• [x] I have added or updated the docstrings associated with my feature using the numpy docstring format.
• [x] I have updated the documentation to highlight my new feature (if appropriate).
• [x] I have added tests to cover my new feature.
• [x] All new and existing tests pass.
• [ ] I have checked that I reproduce the reference simulations or if there are differences they are explained below (if appropriate). If there are changes that are correct, I will update the reference simulation files after this PR is merged.
• [ ] I have checked (e.g., using the benchmarking tools) that this change does not significantly increase typical runtimes. If it does, I have included a justification in the comments on this PR.
• [x] I have updated the CHANGELOG.

[bhazelton]

I think it would be nicer for the beam definitions in the YAML to have a nicer YAML tag, or at least to be more consistent.

I agree with you on this, but we'll have to go through a deprecation process and I'm pretty sure this will trip up on our reference sims. I'm happy to start the deprecation process by putting in the appropriate warnings now.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (92ab9e9) 99.50% compared to head (abd1ac9) 99.50%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #444 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 99.50% 99.50% ======================================= Files 12 12 Lines 2208 2240 +32 ======================================= + Hits 2197 2229 +32 Misses 11 11 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[steven-murray]

Hmmm, let's just make an issue and merge this branch, because I think the process of deprecation should be handled carefully.