In GBIF, the main summury (i.e., value which could be computed from the raw data) are related to the concept of coverage: temporal, taxonomic and spatial/geographic.
In Movebank, here are the other study summary provided:
What we (could) have:
[x] Reference location (similar to Movebank)
[x] Temporal coverage (min/max of the measurements).
[x] Taxonomic (list of unique scientific name)
[ ] Number of tags (equipped, retrieved, with data???)
[ ] Number of records (number of measurements per sensor? -- showing at the same time the sensors used)
Note that it would still be very easy to compute all these variables from the data, but maybe we still want to provide some of them in the datapackage.json file as metadata?
Note also that these field should be required to make them useful. Or do we want only a few of them required?
In GBIF, the main summury (i.e., value which could be computed from the raw data) are related to the concept of coverage: temporal, taxonomic and spatial/geographic.
In Movebank, here are the other study summary provided:
What we (could) have:
Note that it would still be very easy to compute all these variables from the data, but maybe we still want to provide some of them in the datapackage.json file as metadata?
Note also that these field should be required to make them useful. Or do we want only a few of them required?