Closed hoelzro closed 7 years ago
Can we have :create-only
instead? There are still a few annoying crushed (aka non) cased variables/identifiers/adverbs throughout the core setting, and I would personally like to avoid adding more.
@ab5tract As long as we change all of the other createonly
s to create-only
, I support that.
Okay, that sounds like a separate ticket/PR. No need to block this patch on that account, I suppose.
This seems a bit stale, so closing this.
open
already has exclusive mode with :x
. IMO it's overengineered with a billion arguments that are nearly the same as it is, so I rather not add yet another alias for :x
. And sadly, 'createonly' wasn't renamed to 'create-only' in any of the other routines...
I would like to propose a new named parameter for
open
, namely:createonly
.rename
,copy
, andmove
already support it, so I think it's only natural thatopen
does as well.