Open bbkr opened 4 years ago
OK, so what should we do on our side? I don't really see anything actionable. Should package maintainers replace "perl6" with "raku"? Yeah, of course, likely in some backward compatible way. But in the end I think they decide themselves what should be done.
Ping @robertlemmen @dod38fr
On Debian side, we're still figuring out how to investigate the build failures we've seen on mips.
Our team is quite small so we tackle one problem at a time and we've not talked much about renaming perl6
to raku
. I don't see any problem renaming the package to raku-something.
One issue I can see is whether the transition will be smooth (i.e. raku is able to load libraries from usr/share/perl6
and /usr/share/raku
) or hard (raku is not aware of older perl6 names)
Hope this helps
There are many packaged Perl 6 modules in Linux distributions, for example: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl6-geoip2/ (Arch Linux has 40 of them in
perl6-
namespace, Debian has 10 inperl6-
andlibperl6-
namespaces).Module authors are often not Linux package maintainers and are not aware that their work was redistributed. So I think "Path to Raku" should address this issue separately. Probably Linux package maintainers should be contacted directly to re-release under new
raku
namespace.